Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

TALWINDER SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 36739/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
TALWINDER SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-36739-2026 (O&M) -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (242) CRM-M-36739-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:14.07.2026 TALWINDER SINGH … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepinder Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Anil Kaushik, Advocate for the complainant. -.- VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. Instant petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) seeking the concession of regular bail during the pendency of trial in FIR No. 179 dated 20.07.2024, registered under Sections 110, 103(1), 115(2), 127(2), 190(1), 191(3), 238(A), 351(2) and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Sections 308, 302, 323, 342, 201, 149, 148, 506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860), at Police Station Ambala Sadar, District Ambala. 2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that the present FIR came to be registered on the statement of the complainant, Rohtash, son of GAURAV SOROT 2026.07.15 10:05 I attest