SUSHIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Pale o IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229 CWP-26733-2023 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 SUSHIL KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate and Mr. Vinayak Bhanot, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A. G. Haryana. Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Rajvir Singh Sihag, Advocate, for respondents no.3 and 4. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (QRAL) 1. Learned counsel, at the outset, refers to the judgment dated 06.03.2019 passed in CWP-14600-2015, Annexure P-16, appended with the replication in a case filed by a similarly circumstanced employee in the same bank as that of the petitioner, as also on the very post of Sweeper, praying for regularization, which had been allowed and during the contempt proceedings i.e. COCP-3706-2023, the said order was complied with. He, thus, on the strength of the above seeks parity and prays for reconsideration of the matter in light thereof, in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the limited prayer made. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.17 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and order d