SUSHIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 676 CWP-14020-2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.07.2026 Sushil Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that for the charge against the petitioner of not proceedings for training course at Hyderabad, he though was initially in the department proceedings, awarded an punishment of stoppage of one annual increment with temporary effect vide order dated 14.08.2007, Annexure P-3, against which an appeal filed by him is allowed vide order dated 05.07.2001, Annexure P-4, setting aside the same and advising him to be more careful in future and his period of suspension from 15.02.2007 to 09.07.2007 was also ordered to be treated as spent on duty. Prior thereto, the adverse remarks due to the aforesaid, on account of absenting himself to avoid training, which were recorded as not reliable by the Reviewing Officer vide order dated 11.05.2007, Annexure P-5, against which, a representation has also been submitted, which