SURJIT KAUR & ORS. vs HARPAL SINGH & ORS.

-1- 237 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2902-2001 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 SURJIT KAUR & ORS. ....Appellants Versus HARPAL SINGH & ORS. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate & Ms. Kritika Sharma, Advocate Ms. Swati Bansal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Agam Jund, Advocate & Mr. Parmod Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 4. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) As per service report, respondent Nos.2 and 3 have not been served. However, perusal of award shows that no relief was awarded by learned Tribunal against respondent Nos.2 and 3. Learned counsel for the appellants-claimants has stated that no relief is being sought against respondent Nos.2 and 3 as driver of offending vehicle was respondent No.1 and vehicle was owned by respondent No.4. He also submits that vehicle was not insured. Therefore, the liability was fixed by learned Tribunal rightly upon respondent Nos.1 and 4. In view of assertions made by learned counsel for the appellants-claimants, service upon respondent Nos.2 & 3 is dispensed with. RAVINDER DHANIA 2026.07.17 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-2902-2001 -