Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-15

SURAJ KUMAR ALIAS SURAJ SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 13555/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SURAJ KUMAR ALIAS SURAJ SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM M-13555 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 CRM M-13555 of 2026 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present : Mr. Sandeep Godara, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Rehan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab. N.S.SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 with a prayer to grant a regular bail in case FIR No. 92 Dated 01.06.2025 under Sections 221, 121, 324(4), 191 and 190 BNS and (Sections 109, 117(2) and 121(2) BNS added lateron), (corresponding Sections 186, 332, 427, 148, 149, 307, 325 & 333 of IPC) registered at Police Station Division No.2, District Pathankot. AMIT RANA 2026.07.16 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgement/order CRM M-13555 of 2026 -2- 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that from a perusal of the FIR, it is apparent that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, nor there is any averment, which even remotely connects him with the commission of the crime. During the course of investigation, the po