SUNIL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CRM-M-37958-2026 Decided on: 15.07.2026 SUNIL ……Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..…Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at Bar that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents No.3 and 4 to decide representations Annexure P-6 dated 25.05.2026 within a time bound schedule. 2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 3. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on their behalf and states that in view of the statement made today before the Court, she does not intend to file response to the petition. 4. In view thereof but without commenting anything upon merits of the claims made in the representations Annexures P-6 and/or merits of the claim made by the petitioner in the petition in question, respondents No.3 and 4 are directed to dispose of the representations Annexures P-6 at GAURAV BHARDWAJ 2026.07.15 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of