Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-15

SUNIDHI MANOCHA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 35871/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIDHI MANOCHA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-35871-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (249) CRM-M-35871-2026(O&M) Date of decision : 15.07.2026 SUNIDHI MANOCHA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Ashish Soi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vivek Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) seeking grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.116 dated 12.05.2026 registered under Sections 109, 351(2), 324(4), 191(2) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act at Police Station Jamalpur, District Ludhiana. 2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by the complainant Kiran Garg, alleging therein that Raj Kumar, father of the present petitioner was living in her neighbourhood and one boy Navyam Chaudhary @ Sidhu used to pick up the petitioner from her house on daily basis and used to drop her back in the evening and then remained present outside the house of the petition