SUMIT KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 162 CRWP-8394-2026 Date of decision : 14.07.2026 Sumit Kumar ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Aditya Partap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing official respondents to get the detenues, mentioned in para No.2 of the petition, released from the illegal detention of respondents No.4 and 5, who are the owner and Munshi/Jamandar respectively of the Brick Kiln. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenues have been working at the brick kiln of respondent No.4 but they have been illegally detained by respondents No.4 and 5 without any wages and are not allowed to leave the same. 3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only at this stage. 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr.K.D.Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the material placed on record. POONAM