Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

SUMIT ENTERPRISES vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 18146/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUMIT ENTERPRISES
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

152 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18146-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14th July, 2026. SUMIT ENTERPRISES .…...Petitioner(s) V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ......Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR (Through Video Conference/Hybrid Mode) Present Mr. Chetan Jain, Advocate (appeared through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. The controversy raised in the present Writ Petition stands adjudicated by the co‑ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP‑23675‑2025, titled as M/s Shyam Sunder Strips v. Union of India and Others, decided on 04.11.2025. In the said judgment, the Court has categorically held that negative blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) for an unduly long period is impermissible in law. 2. In the present case also, the petitioner’s Electronic Credit Ledger has remained blocked for a period exceeding three weeks, without any justification forthcoming from the respondents. The factual issues of this case is, thus identical to the issues which were considered by this Court in M/s Shyam Sunder Strips (Supra). SURESH KUMAR 2026.