madras High Court · 2026-07-15
Subramani @ Sungidi vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep
- Court
- madras High Court
- Petitioner
- Subramani @ Sungidi
- Respondent
- The State of Tamilnadu Rep
Judgment text excerpt
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP.(MD)No.14371 of 2026 1. Subramani @ Sungidi 2. Ajin ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 4 Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station, Kanyakumari District. (Crime No.239 of 2026) ...Respondent No.1/Complainant 2. Vishal ...Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.239 of 2026 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioners : M/s.S.Balaji Nivas For Respondents : M/s.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate(crl.side) for R1 M/s.T.Bala Rabish for R2 ***** 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/07/2026 06:08:38 pm ) ORDER The present petition has been filed by the accused persons in Crime No. 239 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR wherein they are charged with the offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. A perusal of the FIR reveals that the defacto complainant has not sustained any injuries an