Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

SMT.VEENA GOEL & ANR. vs PRITHVI RAM & ORS.

Citation / case number
FAO 3377/2002
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SMT.VEENA GOEL & ANR.
Respondent
PRITHVI RAM & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

270 FAO-3377-2002 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 SMT. VEENA GOEL & ANR. ....APPELLANTS VERSUS PRITHVI RAM & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Advocate for the appellant(s). Respondents No.1 to 3 ex parte before the Tribunal. Respondents No.5 to 7 were exonerated by the Tribunal. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.4-Insurance Company. YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral) 1. This appeal has been instituted by claimants for enhancement of compensation against the Award dated 03.04.2002 in a petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 vide (for short ‘Act’) passed in MACT case No.38 of 1999 decided by the MACT, Bhiwani (for short “Tribunal”) which a sum of Rs.3,52,300/- has been awarded as compensation to the claimants alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of claim petition till realization on account of death of their son Dinesh Goel in a motor vehicular accident which took place on 23.07.1995 due to rash and negligent driving on the part of respondent No.1 while driving the Truck bearing No.HR-26-7146 (for short ‘offending vehicle’), owned by respondent No.2, which was insure