Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

SHUBHAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 36543/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHUBHAM
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-36543-2026 (O & M) ::1:: (240) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36543-2026 (O & M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Shubham ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Bhanu Pratap, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 BNSS is for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.242 dated 26.06.2025 under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and later on added Section 238(a) of BNS, 2023 (Sections 307 and 34 IPC and later on added Section 201 of IPC) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Tehsil Camp, District Panipat. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that one Navam @ Nabham, the co-accused of the petitioner is alleged to have fired at the complainant though, no injury has been received by him. So far as the present petitioner is concerned, he was only standing alongside the main accused. As the petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2026 but none of the 18 prosecution witnesses has been examined so far, the Trial of the present case is