Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-15

SHIVAM KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 36889/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHIVAM KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-36889-2026 (O&M) -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (209) CRM-M-36889-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:15.07.2026 SHIVAM KUMAR … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Tanuj Sharma, Asstt. AG, Haryana. Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal R. Lamba, Advocate for the complainant. -.- VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition, being the first under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), has been instituted seeking the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 444 dated 13.06.2026 (Annexure P-1), registered under Sections 316(4), 318(4), 336(2) and 338 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding respectively to Sections 408, 420, 463 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860), at Police Station City Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar. 2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case, as emerging from the FIR, is that the complainant, who was serving as the Accounts Manager, alleged that the petitioner was employed as a Comp