SEEMA BANSAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 140 CRM-M-56748-2023 Decided on : 15.07.2026 Seema Bansal . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Nitin Katoria, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, DAG, Haryana. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. Instant petition, under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023), has been filed for quashing of the order dated 30.05.2023 (Annexure P-7), whereby the petitioner has been declared as ‘proclaimed person’ in case No. NACT 179 of 2021, titled as, “Bank of India v. Seema Bansal”, on account of her non-appearance and its consequential proceedings and subsequent orders arising therefrom. 2. In the present case, on 09.11.2023, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, operation of the impugned order dated 30.05.2023 (P-7) was stayed by the Coordinate Bench of this court. The relevant extract of the order dated 09.11.2023, is reproduced here-under :- “ Counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner was declared as proclaimed offender in a complaint case wherein the address of the