SATISH KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M-31309-2026 (O & M) ::1:: (216) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31309-2026 (O & M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Satish Kumar ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. U.K. Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 BNSS is for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.31 dated 19.02.2026 under Sections 420, 406 IPC (now Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS) and Section 22 of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 registered at Police Station City Sonipat, Sonipat. 2. The present FIR came to be registered at the instance of Poonam Rani and reads as under:- To, The D.C.P. Sir, Sonipat. Subject: application regarding no action taken on complaint filed at City Police Station. Respected Sir, With due respect, I submit that 1, Poonam Rani, wife of Late Shri Shrilal, resident of 1882/29, Vikas Nagar, Gali No. 4, Kakroi Road, Tehsil and District Sonipat, am a law-abiding, peace-loving and respectable citizen. On 10.04.2025, I filed a complaint at Ci