SATBIR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 208 CWP-16410-2017 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 SATBIR SINGH​ ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present:​ Ms. Parbeen Kumar Dharwal, Advocate for Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. ​ ​ Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.​ ​ ​ ​ **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.​ ​ Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to treat the petitioner as Constable-Wireless Operator from 29.01.1991, the date when other employees were converted and grant all consequential benefits arising therefrom. 2.​ ​ Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is entitled to the claim as raised hereinabove, by referring to the cases of similarly circumstanced employees. 3.​ ​ Learned State counsel however refers to the written statement dated 17.01.2019 and states that his claim is not at par with the said employees, as he could not pass his basic training course due to absence. 4.​ ​ Heard. 5.​ ​ It would be apposite to refer to paragraph No.11 of the afore RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:41 I am the author of this document CWP-16410-2017​ ​ -2- wr