Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-13

SANTOSH KUMARI AND OTHERS vs SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 3181/2005
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANTOSH KUMARI AND OTHERS
Respondent
SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

302 FAO-3181-2005 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 SANTOSH KUMARI AND OTHERS ....APPELLANTS VERSUS SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. D.K. Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral) CM-17905-CII-2024 1. The present application has been filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking exemption from filing an application for bringing on record the legal representatives of respondent No. 2. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and appellants are exempted from filing an application for bringing on record the legal representatives of respondent No.2. 3. Application stands disposed of. FAO-3181-2005 4. Notice was issued to respondent No.1, who is owner of the offending vehicle by way of publication in newspaper for 09.04.2026. However, none has appeared on his behalf and he is proceeded ex parte. PRIYANKA THAKUR 2026.07.15 19:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 21.12.2004 passed in MACT case No.14 of 15.01.2004 decided by the MACT, Rupnagar (for short “Tribunal”) in a