Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

SANGEETA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Citation / case number
CWP 21293/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANGEETA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21293-2026 DECIDED ON:16.07.2026 SANGEETA .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Mukesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) 1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and regularize the services of the petitioners in terms of the policy instructions dated 18.03.2011 (Annexure P-1) with effect from 18.03.2011, by treating them at par with similarly situated Computer Operators appointed on contractual basis and subsequently regularized vide order dated 23.12.2011 (Annexure P-2), and in the light of the judgments passed by this Court in CWP No. 27344 of 2013, Hargopal and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others, decided on 02.04.2026 (Annexure P-3), and CWP No. 5307 of 2025, Kartar Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others, decided on 06.02.2026 (Annexure P-4), and further directing the respondents to grant all consequential service benefits, including the benef