SALAMO vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37912-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 SALAMO …Petitioner V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Shubham Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG Haryana. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) 1. The petition under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeks following reliefs: (i) direction to official respondents No. 2 and 3 to take action against respondents No. 4 and 5 for not registering FIR against respondents No. 6 and 7; (ii) direction to respondents No. 2 to 5 to register FIR against respondents No. 6 and 7; (iii) directions to respondents No. 2 to 5 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 6 and 7; (iii) direction to respondents No. 2 to 5 to consider and decide representation dated 30.06.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 27.06.2026, petitioner, who was a labourer, was working on JCB Machine on land of Narender Bhalla in village Bansghati, Pinjore, District Panchkula. Respondent No. 7, Gagan son of Avtar Singh visited the spot, a