madras High Court · 2026-07-16
S.Jeyakumar vs Raghunath,
- Court
- madras High Court
- Petitioner
- S.Jeyakumar
- Respondent
- Raghunath,
Judgment text excerpt
LPA(MD) No. 19 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL LPA(MD) No. 19 of 2026 and C.M.P.(MD)No.7470 of 2026 1. S.Jeyakumar Represented by its Power Agent, Amala Devi 2. Anitha, Represented by its Power Agent, Amala Devi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Raghunath 2. J.Loganathan, I.P.S., The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. K.Subbiah, The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch (CCB-III), Madurai City. ..Respondent(s) Letters Patent filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Appeal as against the order dated 05.06.2026 and made in Cont.P.(MD). No. 1341/2026 by this Court. __________ Page1 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/07/2026 06:41:00 pm ) LPA(MD) No. 19 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan for Mr.S. Sakthi Siddharth For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Kokilavane (R1) Mr.D.Venkatesh (R2 & R3) Counsel for State ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) The Letters Patent Appeal had been preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent questioning and challenging the direction issued in a contempt petition in Cont.P.(MD)