Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

RUKHSAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRWP 2376/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RUKHSAR AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

291 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2376-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 RUKHSAR AND OTHERS ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Abdul Aziz, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Kuljinder Dhindsa, AAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The opinion of the Medical Board of PGIMER reads as under:- “The Medical Board conducted clinic-radiological examination of Mohd. Ilyas s/o Mohd. Ramjan, Vishal@ Vicky s/o Bittu and Mohd. Sahil @Kalu s/o Mohd. Sakeel. X-ray imaging was reviewed in consultation Dr. Tarvinder Singh, Department of Radio diagnosis. Final Medical Opinion and Findings The Medical Board has arrived at the following conclusions 1. 1. Mohd. Sahil Kallu:- Right ankle fracture (involving both the medial malleolus and lateral malleolus)- Grievous injury 2. 2. Mohd. Ilyas:- Fracture of the fibula in the right leg-Grievous injury 3. 3. Vishal @ Vicky- No evidence of any fracture- No grievous injury.” VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.17 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2376-2026 -2- In view of the above, no further orders are required t