Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-13

ROOP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 20771/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ROOP SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

124. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20771-2026 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 ROOP SINGH …. PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …. RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Harmanjot Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Viranjeet Singh Mahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. T.P.S. Walia, AAG, Punjab. ----- SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) 1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner, who is working as daily wager/work charged employee with the respondents, in pursuance to the policy dated 18.03.2011 (Annexure P-2) and policy dated 16.05.2023 (Annexure P-3), and to pay him the minimum of pay scale plus dearness allowance plus grade pay along with arrears in view of judgment of this Court in CWP No.19238 of 2013-Amrish Sharma and others SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.14 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-20771-2026 -2- Versus State of Punjab and others and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Punjab Versus Jagjit Singh, (2017) 1 SCC 148. 2. Learned co