Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

RAVNEET KAUR vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 24012/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAVNEET KAUR
Respondent
STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 136 CRM-M-24012-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 Ravneet Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present:-. Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Vij, Addl. P.P. U.T. Chandigarh. ***** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J.(Oral) Prayer in the petition under Section 528 of BNSS is for directing the trial court for deciding the trial in FIR No.149 dated 17.07.2018, under Sections 420, 468, 471 of IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act, Police Station Sector-3, Chandigarh in time bound manner. Status report has been filed by learned State counsel, which is taken on record. Report has been received from learned Trial Court explaining the reasons why trial of the case, which pertains to the year 2018 has been delayed. It appears that supplementary challan was presented in the case only on 19.12.2025. It is stated that charges have been framed in the case HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.07.17 19:26 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-24012-2026 (O&M) -2- and 5 prosecution witnesses have been recorded out of 20. Apparently,