RAVINDER SINGH @ RICKY vs STATE OF PUNJAB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (160) INCOMP-1480-2026 Date of Decision:-13.07.2026 Ravinder Singh ……Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: None. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1. The aforesaid petition was instituted by Mr. Ankit Bishnoi, Advocate, on 23.03.2026. Upon scrutiny, the Registry raised certain objections on 24.03.2026, which remained unattended and were never removed by the learned counsel concerned. 2. In terms of Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, any petition on which objections are raised by the Registry is required to be taken back by the counsel/party concerned for removal of objections and re-filing within the prescribed period. In the present case, the file was never taken back for re- filing despite repeated notes published by the Registry from time to time. 3. When the matter was listed before this Court, the case was called out twice; however, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. This conduct reflects that the appellant and/or learned counsel have lost interest in prosecuting the matter and do not