Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

RAVINDER SINGH @ GAGAN vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 34871/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAVINDER SINGH @ GAGAN
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.34871 of 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 332 CRM-M No.34871 of 2026 Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Ravinder Singh @ Gagan ... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Jashandeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab, for the respondent-State. ---- MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. The instant one is the third petition as filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.55 dated 25.09.2022 registered under Sections 364, 342 and 34 of IPC (Sections 302 and 201 of IPC added later on) at Police Station Bhadaur, District Barnala. His previous two petitions had been dismissed vide orders dated 05.11.2024 and 12.08.2025 respectively. The second petition bearing CRM-M-32413-2025 had been dismissed by making the MANJU 2026.07.16 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order /judgment Chandigarh CRM-M No.34871 of 2026 -2- following observations:- “6. There is no eyewitness to the murder of the victim. It is a case of circumstantial eviden