RAM KUMAR vs U.H.B.V.N. AND ORS.

pelea. ame IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 682 CWP-17673-2009 (O & M) Date of decision: 17.07.2026 RAM KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus U.H.B.V.N. AND ORS. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: | None for the petitioner. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (QRAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for reimbursement of medical expenses for treatment having been taken from a non-empanelled hospital. 2. It is the admitted case between the parties that reimbursement has been made at PGI rates since the hospital from where the treatment had been taken, was non-empanelled. Learned counsel also submits that the judgment in Shiva Kant Jha vs. Union of India, CWP-694-2015, decided on 13.04.2018 shall not be applicable to the facts of the present case. 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with liberty to file a representation by distinguishing the aforesaid judgment. 17.07.2026 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.17 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and order dgmnent.