Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-15

RAJKUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 19300/2017
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJKUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19300-2017 Date of decision: 15.07.2026 Raj Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate and Mr. Rajesh Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226- 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to compute the contract services w.e.f. 28.01.1998 to 25.07.2004 to the regular service of the petitioner and to release all the consequential benefits after count the contract service in favour of the petitioner along with interest @ 18% per annum. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.26640 of 2023 titled as Ramesh Chand Yaduwanshi Vs. State of Haryana and others decided on 02.07.2026 and submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment. The petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Lecturer in Electronics Engineering on contra