Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

RAJIV KUMAR SOOD vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 10310/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJIV KUMAR SOOD
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.10310 of 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216 CRM-M No.10310 of 2026 Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Rajiv Kumar Sood ... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. G.S. Jagpal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab, for the respondent-State. Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, for the complainant. ---- MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking regular bail in the FIR mentioned below:- FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 11 30.11.2024 Economic Offence 384, 420, 465, 467, 468 Wing, Punjab and 120-B of IPC Vigilance Bureau, MANJU District Ludhiana 2026.07.15 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order /judgment Chandigarh CRM-M No.10310 of 2026 -2- 2. As per the allegations, a complaint was received at Vigilance Bureau, Economic Wing, Ludhiana which was enquired into and it was revealed that the accused Satnam Singh Dhawan in connivance with the accused Bhupinder Punj and some other persons used t