RAJINDER PARSAD vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 225 CWP-4353-2023O&M) Date of Decision:- 13.07.2026 Rajinder Parsad … Pe oner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Akash Kundu, Advocate for the pe oner. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. Aag, Haryana. ***** NIDHI GUPTA, J. Present Civil Writ Pe on under Ar cles 226 of the Cons tu on of India has been filed by the pe oner for issuance of a writ in the nature of Cer orari for quashing the order/direc on dated 24.09.2015 (Annexure P-2) issued by respondent No.2 and direct the respondents to grant the pe oner the pending increments, ACP benefits and all consequen al benefits in terms of le er dated 22.12.2020 (Annexure P-6). 2. It is inter alia submi ed by learned counsel for the pe oner that the pe oner was ini ally appointed as a Peon on 18.10.1982 in the office of Assistant Registrar, Narwana. Vide order dated 14.02.2012, pe oner was promoted to the post of Clerk. It is submi ed that as per the order of promo on, there was a condi on precedent that pe oner was required to pass NEELAM KUMARI 2026.07.15 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and H