Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

RAJINDER KUMAR vs SURINDER KUMAR

Citation / case number
FAO 2290/2000
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJINDER KUMAR
Respondent
SURINDER KUMAR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

-1- 234 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2290-2000 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 RAJINDER KUMAR ....Appellant Versus SURINDER KUMAR & ANR ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Kesar Arora, Advocate for Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R. C. Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Ram Avtar, Advocate for respondent No.2-Insurance Company. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) CM-13783-CII-2000 For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed and the delay of 532 days in filing the present appeal, is hereby condoned. Main case Present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-claimant who had suffered injuries in accident dated 13.03.1993 on account of rash and negligent driving by respondent-driver while driving car make Tata Sierra bearing registration No.DL-IU-0186 (hereinafter referred to as ‘offending vehicle’), being aggrieved by the award of insufficient RAVINDER DHANIA 2026.07.17 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-2290-2000 -2- compensation of Rs.75,000/- awarded vide impugned award dated 04.01.1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribuna