Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

RAJAT RASTOGI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 37681/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJAT RASTOGI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 CRM-M-37681-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CRM-M-37681-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 RAJAT RASTOGI PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Divyanshu Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG Haryana. *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) 1. Vide this petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023, petitioner seeks directions to official respondents No.1 to 3 to conduct fair, impartial, expeditious and effective investigation in FIR No.129 dated 07.05.2026 under Sections 109(1), 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023 and 251(1-b)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station, Sector 9-A, Gurugram, District Gurugram or to transfer investigation to some independent agency or senior officer. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above- mentioned FIR was registered on complaint of the petitioner regarding a firing incident dated 06.05.2026 by an unknown masked assailant. Only one person, namely, Vivek Kumar Tripathi was arrested who disclosed the complici