Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

RAJ KUMAR vs SULEKH CHAND

Citation / case number
CR 4885/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
SULEKH CHAND
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CR-4885-2023 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CR-4885-2023 (O&M) Date of decision :- 14.07.2026 Raj Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Sulekh Chand .... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Vishva Nath Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Kamboj, Advocate and Mr. Manvir Singh Kamboj, Advocate for the respondent. **** AMARJOT BHATTI J. 1. Petitioner Raj Kumar has filed present civil revision against impugned order dated 08.08.2023 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, whereby application filed by petitioner/defendant for adducing additional evidence has been erroneously declined in Civil Suit No. 151 of 2019, titled “Sulekh Chand versus Raj Kumar”. 2. Learned counsel representing petitioner/defendant argued that respondent/plaintiff filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 13.03.2018 regarding 08 Kanal 0 Marlas of land situated in village Kanalsi, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar as detailed therein as per Jamabandi for the year 2014-15, with consequential relief of LALIT SHARMA 2026.07.16 16:58 I attest