Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 4702/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4702-2025 DECIDED ON: 14.07.2026 RAJ KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. Kamal Narula, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Proxy counsel, for Mr. Rakesh Kumar Kachura, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, for cancellation of the anticipatory bail, already granted to respondent Nos.2 and 3, vide order dated 16.12.2024 (Annexure P-4), by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, in case, FIR No.413 dated 23.11.2024, under sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station City Ferozepur, District Ferozepur. 2. Complainant, namely Raj Kumar and Ashwani Kumar, claiming rights through their attorneys, Shimla Rani and Manohar Lal Khanna, submitted a complaint dated 07.12.2021, alleging that three shops originally belonging to their grandfather, Tara Chand alias Tara Singh, were mutated only in favour of the male legal heirs, namely Om Parkash, Mohinder Pal and Manohar Lal, despite the fact that Ta