Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

RAHUL KUMAR ALIAS RAHUL vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 37402/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAHUL KUMAR ALIAS RAHUL
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37402-2026 Date of Decision:16.07.2026 Rahul Kumar @ Rahul …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Varinder Basa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, Sr. DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (under Section 439 Cr.P.C) with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in case FIR No.333, dated 06.11.2025 registered under Sections 115(2), 118, 118(2), 190 and 191(3) of B.N.S {Sections 323,324,326,148 and 149 of IPC} at Police Station Civil Lines Batala, Gurdaspur, Punjab (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the occurrence had taken place in the present case on 20.10.2025, whereas, the F.I.R was got registered by the complainant on 06.11.2025, after an unexplained delay of 16 days. Even as per the prosecution version, the petitioner was allegedly armed with a danda and had caused injuries on the head, above ear and right wrist of the complainant. The injury on wrist has been declared to be grievous in nature. H