RADHEY SHYAM AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

227 Radhey Shyam & ors. ...... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & ors. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1 Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioners have already been allotted an alternate site in the newly established Meat Market. 2 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3 Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed off. ( PANKAJ JAIN ) 13.07.2026 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.14 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document