POONAM DEVI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

2026: PHHC 094828 Sener IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CWP-31509-2018 (O & M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 POONAM DEVI ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Rajat Ahalwat, Advocate for Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A. G. Haryana. Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (QRAL) 1. Learned counsel is unable to state as to whether the petitioner is continuing in job which was a query raised, for which time was sought way back on 20.11.2023. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents No.3 and 4, on the other hand, submits that the present petition is not even maintainable as the petitioner had been appointed through out-sourcing agency, and refers to Annexure R-3/2 alongwith written statement, which is dated 04.02.2020 ie. after filing of this case showing that and at that time, he was in service of a private firm. 3. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to press the present petition. 4, Ordered accordingly. 13.07.2026 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reas