POONAM DEVI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2026.07.17 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRWP-8428-2026 -2- 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation (Annexure P-3) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law. 7. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take to appropriate law, if any. 8. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. 17.07.2026 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) hitesh/mks JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable: YES / NO MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2026.07.17 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh