PARTEEK LALL AND ANR vs A.K. SINGH AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210/2 COCP-2365-2018 Date of decision: July 14, 2026 PRATEEK LALL AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate with Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh K. Kataria, Advocate, Ms. Parul Chaudhary, Advocate and Ms. Prabhjot Kaur, Advocate for respondent no.9. Mr. P.S. Hundal, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.S. Hundal, Advocate for respondents no.10 and 11. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed alleging violation of the interim order dated 10.11.2017, Annexure P-1, passed by this Court in CWP-25283-2017, which reads as under: Service is complete. Counsel for the respondents pray for time to file their reply(ies). On their request, adjourned to 20.11.2017. Till then, the private respondents are restrained from raising construction. 2. Learned State counsel submits that the order was not violated JASPREET KAUR and no construction on the site was raised. Specific affidavit to that effect 2026.07.17 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and