PAMMI vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH

::1:: (225) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17732-2026 (O & M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Pammi ... Petitioner Versus UT Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Deepak Jaglan, Advocate with Mr. Rajat Narwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor for UT Chandigarh with Mr. Dixit Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate and Mr. Sarasmi Budhiraja, Advocate for the respondent. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 BNSS is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.88 dated 07.07.2025 under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 (Sections 302 and 34 IPC), registered at Police Station Maloya, Chandigarh. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that though the petitioner is duly named in the FIR, during the course of the Trial, all the material witnesses have not supported the prosecution case qua the petitioner. As the petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2025 but only 09 of the 32 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far, the Trial of the present case VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.14 17:58 I attest to the accu