Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

NIRMAL SINGH @ NIMMA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 28952/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NIRMAL SINGH @ NIMMA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-28952-2026 -1- 298 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28952-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 Nirmal Singh @ Nimma …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Kumar Adia, AAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 482 of Cr.P.C.) with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 23.01.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Special Court, Tarn Taran, whereby the bail of the petitioner was cancelled and the bail bonds and surety bonds were ordered to be forefeited. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner had appeared before the trial Court and was admtted to interim bail. He further submits that the cost of Rs.7,500/- has been deposited by the petitioner with the District Legal Services Authority, Tarn Taran. 3. Learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the factual submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. HEMLATA 202