NARENDER vs STATE OF HARYANA

206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32794-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 NARENDER …Petitioner V/S STATE OF HARYANA …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Sourabh Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kshitij Bharti, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Shashikant Gupta, Advocate and Ms. Anuradha, Advocate for the complainant. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) 1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 41 dated 01.03.2026 under Sections 115, 126, 3(5), 351(3) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Nangal Chaudhri, District Mahendergarh. Offences under Sections 109 and 238 BNS were added in the FIR and Section 110 BNS was deleted from the FIR during investigation. This is the first petition for anticipatory bail. 2. On 04.06.2026, following order was passed: “Learned counsel for the petitioner has inter alia argued that although the petitioner has been named in the FIR, yet, he has not been specifically attributed any injury detected on person of the injured; that although there is a medical opinion declaring all the three injuries collectively as dangerous to life, yet, it has not been mention