N.S.NEKI vs STATE OF PB.

2026:PHHC:097281 Daily Lok Adalat Bench No.2. 503 CWP-12077-2004 (O&M) N.S.NEKI VS STATE OF PB. Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Thapar, Addl. A.G. Punjab for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.5. None for respondent No.6. 2 26 2K 2 2K Notice issued to the petitioner received back unserved with the report that he has since retired from the service. No other address of the petitioner is available on the file. Notice issued to respondents No. 5 & 6 also received back unserved with the report that they have also retired. No other address is available on the file. However, Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent No.5 and has stated that he is not in contact with respondent No.5 and he is also not having any other address of respondent No.5. In view of the same, the present writ petition consigned to record with liberty to petitioner to get it revived if so, desired. (R.K.Nehru) President (Ram Chand Gupta) 16.07.2026 Member joyti rani JOYTI RANI 2026.07.17 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document