MUKUL TOMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M-1729-2026 (O&M) -1- 206 2026:PHHC:096107 aoe IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1729-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 Mukul Tomar ...Petitioner(s) Vs. State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Senior DAG, Haryana. 2K N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS, 2023) with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.129, dated 02.09.2025, registered under Sections 25(1)(B) of Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Mohana, District Sonipat, Haryana. 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail, this Court had noticed the following contentions:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was nominated in the present case only on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused, which is inadmissible in evidence; except the disclosure statement of co-accused, there is no incriminating evidence to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence; the petitioner is having clean and clear antecedents and is not in