MOHD TARIK SAH vs STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M-31251-2026 -1- 209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31251-2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Mohd. Tarik Sah …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parmod Kumar, AAG, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No. 176, dated 27.03.2026 registered under Sections 3(5), & 108 of BNS, 2023 (Earlier Sections 34 and 306 of IPC), at Police Station Palla, District Faridabad. 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 27.05.2026, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same have been reproduced below:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even from the reading of the allegations levelled by the complainant in the FIR, no offence under Section 108 of BNS is made out against the petitioner. In fact, there were temperamental differences between the petitioner and his co-accused and the deceased, who was brother of the pet