Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-17

MOHD. JUNED @ MOHD JUNAID vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 33929/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MOHD. JUNED @ MOHD JUNAID
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 145 CRM-M-33929-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.07.2026 Mohd. Juned @Mohd Junaid ..... Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. . ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral) This petition for pre-arrest bail is the first petition filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.178 dated 28.07.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 110, 115(2), 126(2), 190, 191(3), 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Sadar Tauru, District Nuh. 2. Vide order dated 06.07.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.17 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 0