Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-15

MIRNALI BORAH AND ANR vs RAM KUMAR GUJJAR

Citation / case number
FAO 3161/2002
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MIRNALI BORAH AND ANR
Respondent
RAM KUMAR GUJJAR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

FAO-3161-2002 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026 MRINALI BORAH AND ANOTHER ....Appellants VERSUS RAM KUMAR GUJJAR AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Ms. Swati Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Deepak Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Ram Avtar, Advocate for respondent No.3-the Insurance Company. ***** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral) 1. This appeal has been instituted by claimants against the Award dated 18.02.2002 passed in MACT case No.168 of 2001 decided by the MACT, Panchkula (for short “Tribunal”) in a petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 vide which a sum of Rs.9,10,000/- has been awarded as compensation to the claimants along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of claim petition till realization on account of death of P. K. Borah in a motor vehicle accident. 2. From the pleadings of parties, following issues were framed by the learned Tribunal:- PRIYANKA THAKUR 2026.07.15 19:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document rash and negligent driving of trolla bearing no.HR-47-6658 by respondent no.1? OPP 2. If issue No.1 is proved in affirmati