MEENU BANSAL vs UNION BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP-19134-2026 (O&M) -1- 116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19134-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 MEENU BANSAL ..Petitioner Versus UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Karan Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate Mr. Ajay Singh Rana, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3-Bank. Mr. Charanjit Bakshi, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.4-UOI. SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ in the nature of certiorari, direction or order quashing the impugned letter dated 28.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Rampura Phul Branch in District Bathinda to Govt Bus & Relationship Delhi/Co Annex - Delhi being in contravention of the policy of the Government of India, especially governed through letters dated 08.08.2014 (Annexure P-3) and 26.11.2025 (Annexure P-4) as interpreted by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in WP No. 16860 of 2026 titled as "All India Union Bank Officer Staff Association Vs. Union Bank of India & Ors." 2. Learned