MEENAKSHI SYAN vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118 CWP-8832-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 14.07.2026 MEENAKSHI SYAN ....Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. Vatanjeet Bajwan, Advocate, Mr. Manish Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Ms. Avin Sandhu, Advocate for respondent-GMADA. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) CM-9444-CWP-2026 The present application had been filed seeking preponement of the date of hearing of the main petition. Since the main petition is already listed on Board for hearing, the present application stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. CM-9445-CWP-2026 For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Annexures P-10 and P-11 are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. CWP-8832-2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing SANDAL SHARMA 2026.07.17 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-8832-2026 (O&M) -2- the resp