MAYANK CHAUDHARY vs THE STATE OF HARYANA

CRWP-8067-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CRWP-8067-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 13.07.2026 MAYANK CHAUDHARY .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate for the petitioners. . SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for writ in the nature of mandamus. 2. It has been prayed by the petitioner that a direction be issued to the respondent No.2 to decide his application dated 29.05.2026 (Annexure P-2), for grant of regular parole for a period of ten weeks, within the stipulated time. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana appears on behalf of respondent-State. Hence service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.13 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8067-2026 (O&M) 2 5. Heard. 6. Since the period of disposal of application seeking for regular parole for a period of ten weeks, has been stipulated in the provisions of ‘Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022’ and as