KARTIK CHANDRA AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP-20904-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 147 CWP-20904-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 Kartik Chandra Maity and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Govind Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sourabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate and Mr. Daksh Saini, Advocate and Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for respondents No.6 and 7. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.7 – the Secretary, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, to take a decision on the representation dated 28.05.2026 (Annexure P-8) made by the petitioners. 2. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel for respondents No.6 and 7 have no objection if the petitioners’ above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.14 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integr